Introduction
We enter a new millennium in chains. Despite centuries of political
struggle we remain un-free. Communism, socialism, and democracy have
failed. At no prior point in the history of man have the inhabitants of
this planet been more policed, taxed, imprisoned, contaminated, indoctrinated,
infiltrated, monitored, ruled, governed, robbed, denied, conformed, exploited,
oppressed, deceived, and denied. Virtue and ethics have given way to
obedience. Intelligence and reason have given way to orthodoxy.
Television has substituted truth. Individual experience has been channeled
into a unified collective perception, where prefabricated lies are packaged in
the trappings of truth, and funneled into the uncritical minds of a passive audience. We live in an age where
critical thought has all but vanished and the mind is left to assimilate the
orchestrated interpretations of the powerful. The instinct for individual
action has drowned into the sea of passive entitlements and demands to be
protected. Like a cancer, the State has consumed the population, one by
one, and replaced the individual with a collective of snitching parasites.
Victimhood has become a virtue while productivity, strength, and virtue have
come vices. Like a host made docile by the poison of a parasite, the minds
of the people have been anesthetized by government. They lie dormant
in an intellectual stupor, smiling like idiots, as their essence is assimilated
into the mechanism of their own oppression. Lifting our heads above the
stink of human decay, we survey the landscape of collective amnesia and ask our
selves, "What is to be done?"
What is to be done?
We are few in number. When we speak, they shout. We are like
infidels whispering, "God does not exist," from the middle row of a
church. The words, democracy is dictatorship, so simple and true,
offend the ears of the believers. In their minds, so small but many, we
are blasphemers. They respond with every tangential insult imaginable,
unwilling to even permit a questioning voice its due. Their reaction, as
predictable as the workings of a simple machine, is sharp. In a dark age,
even the smallest spark offends the eyes of minds festering in the dank
blackness of disuse.
In our quest for change we are like diamonds in an avalanche of coal.
Made of the same substance, but internally organized, we shine through the
opaque dust. We have no chance to fight the inertia, strong as we may be, for our small
numbers do not permit us the advantage. The State is
omnipresent. The apparatus of oppression is finely tuned. The
productive capacity of millions of individuals has been robbed and its weight is
applied to the hammer which smashes the anvil of oppression with such force that even a
diamond cannot resist.
We hold the truth - the seed of a world to come. We must guard this seed
like the last individual of a species seeking fertile ground. If we are to seed the future, we
cannot squander our seed on impulsive defiance for the sake of momentary
release. We must reason about our struggle and seek our advantage.
Let us begin by stating our cause and lay out the strategy that best leverages
our advantage.
Our Cause
The concept of anarchy has fallen to misinterpretation. Even its
literal meaning, "against or without hierarchy", has given way, in
modern times, to that of chaos and violence. The reasons for this
misinterpretation are twofold. On the one hand, the methodology utilized
by some anarchists to achieve the absence of hierarchy has bestowed a false
interpretation of its goals on the collective mind. The use of violence
and destruction, by these anarchists, has impressed upon the people the notion
that violence and destruction is the aim of anarchism. On the other hand,
governments and the establishment media have seized upon this
mischaracterization to their advantage, propagating the distorted view that
anarchism is not a philosophy with lofty goals, but an activity of miscreants.
What, then, is anarchism? Anarchism is the belief that individuals are
the basis of society. As the basis of society, anarchism reasons that only
by the development and expression of individuality can society develop to its
fullest. Anarchism
acknowledges the primacy of the individual. Society, in the anarchist
conception, is merely the epiphenomenon of individuality across the many
instances of humankind. As such, society is not a thing in itself. It
bears no causal relationship to the individual. As a
thing that lacks essence, talk of the needs of society is futile and
unproductive. When society is placed before the individual, the
individual, an existing thing, is sacrificed for that which does not essentially
exist.
The virtue of anarchism rests in the good itself. When we consider the
good, we consider the ethical conduct of the individual. The basis of all
ethics is reason. Since reason is the essential defining characteristic of
humankind, the practice of ethics is the manifestation of human nature. Evil, as
the absence of good, is the product of the absence of ethics. Ethics, the
practice of reason applied to one's actions, can only exist where individuals
are free to choose their actions. Law - the application of force to govern
one's actions - denies the practice of ethics by substituting reason and free
will with
obedience. Thus, so long as there exists law, there exists no practice of
reason. Ethics, a product of reason, ceases to exist. Without ethics, there is no good.
The absence of good is evil. Therefore, government is, by its very nature,
a source of
evil.
Fundamentally a rational being, the nature of the human individual can only
be expressed through the expression of that nature. We stand for the free
expression of reason in its many forms, the manifestation of which is ethical
conduct. We believe that the ethical life is the good life.
Realizing that obedience is the abnegation of freedom and reason, we call for a
world without government. Democracy and republicanism, the political
zeitgeist of our time, are inherently dictatorial. The irrational fears of
those who have been robbed of their reason are ameliorated at the expense of the
freedom of those who retain their wits. The democratic State has become
the organized expression of dependency and want of responsibility. We
declare our freedom by asserting the primacy of free will, ethical choice, and
responsibility. Government, a hindrance to these principles, must be
dissolved.
Our First Steps
Government, as we have seen above, denies humanity the practice of its
nature. Government, therefore, is unnatural. No free and ethical
individual can endure government. Free and ethical individuals should, as
an expression of ethical conduct, seek to eliminate government. But how
does an ethical individual eliminate government?
In order to address this question, we would be wise to seek our
advantage. If ethics is an expression of reason, it follows that ethical
individuals are intelligent. Unless intelligence is limited to but a few
individuals, we must assume that there are many other individuals sufficiently
intelligent to live ethically, who, nevertheless, do not live ethically.
These individuals, expressing their lack of ethics, support the existence of
government. Our task, it seems, is to shake these individuals from their
slumber.
Having identified our first task, specifically, to shake from their slumber
individuals sufficiently intelligent to live ethically, we must now determine
how best to pursue our task. Intelligent individuals, by nature, seek
information. We must be ready to provide them with the information they
need to realize that the application of ethical principles is the key to their
liberation. Additionally, we must provide them with the arguments
supporting the conclusion that intelligent individuals must oppose
government. Since we are few in numbers and small in relation to the
powers who oppose us, we would do well by learning from other small entities
that subvert larger entities. The virus is our metaphor.
The meme is our virus. Thus, our first
task is the propagation of memes supporting the
anarchist philosophy.
Various mechanisms, efficient in this task, exist. One mechanism is the
Internet. Never before has there existed a means so accessible for the
economical propagation of memes. Rational anarchists should take full
advantage of the Internet as a vector for subversive distribution of memes.
Another mechanism is personal influence. By conducting oneself
ethically, one teaches others the value of ethics. The belief that
individuals will not conduct themselves ethically in the absence of an external
force is easily disproved through example. The call for government is
based on the fear of what would ensue in its absence. Rational anarchists
can use their inherently ethical nature to provide counter examples to this
belief. Additionally, rational anarchists can provide support to other
rational anarchists. An effective means of support is to extend
opportunity when it presents itself to other rational anarchists. By
promoting each other we increase our power and thus our ability to use our
ethical example as a means to teach others. Ethics requires the acceptance
of responsibility. By accepting responsibility we increase our contact
with others and thus the opportunity to teach by example.
Teaching by example, when practiced individually, can have a great
affect. Even greater is the influence of practicing ethics
collectively. This leads us to the second step. This step can be
taken in parallel to the first. Our second task is the creation and
support of institutions that supplant the perceived need for government.
Rational anarchists should create virtual communities. These virtual
communities could provide services. For example, we should create collectives
to help each other find jobs, share information, and forward our mutual success.
By creating non-governmental sources of mutual support, we can prove, by
example, that the practice of ethics replaces the perceived need for government.
Finally, we can provide each other with mutual defense. There is no
better way of teaching others the value of ethics than by standing up against
injustice. If you see someone who needs to be defended, stand up for them! If you see an injustice happening, oppose it
openly! If you
encounter a distortion of the truth, correct it! Anarchism and ethics
require the application of action to principles.
What is not to be done?
Many anarchists delude themselves into believing that uncontrolled outbursts
against the forces of oppression will somehow bring about change. Nothing
could be further from the truth. The brick you throw at a police officer during
a demonstration will reinforce the idea, within the public mind, that government
is necessary. This is not to argue against the proposition that the
government deserves to be met with violence. Rather, the argument is that
the government should not be met with violence when it will strengthen the
government's argument for its own necessity, reinforce the belief that violence
is the goal of anarchy, and place behind bars yet another anarchist who could be
actively working to undermine the concept that government is necessary.
Rational
anarchists should not engage in unnecessary activities that provide
greater means of oppression by government against the individual.
Those who equate anarchism with braking the law are foolish. Anarchism
is
not about breaking the law, it is about abolishing the government and
by this
means abolishing law. There
is a difference. When you break the law unnecessarily, you risk being
fined or imprisoned.
If you are fined, your money goes to the government you oppose. In
many jurisdictions, a large portion of
your fine goes to fund the police. Thus, by
breaking the law unnecessarily you are strengthening the police. If
you are imprisoned,
the government must approriate funds to incarcerate you. These funds
are
obtained by robbing from the productive members of society through
taxation.
Even worse, these funds pay the salaries of the lowest form of
government agent
- the prison guard. Thus, by being imprisoned, you are increasing the
employment of evil individuals at the expense of productive
individuals.
Even if you do not get caught, you are still increasing the power of
the
state. By behaving irresponsibly you increase the belief that
government
is needed. By destroying government property, you increase the
government's need for income and help to employ government workers to
repair
your damage. By destroying private property you make enemies of the
very
individuals you need to recruit. Most importantly, if you conduct
yourself
unethically in the fight for anarchism you harm yourself.
Our position on violence is that violence should be employed only when it is
necessary and only when it is the only means available to protect the lives and
well being of oneself or others. This judgment should be made
prudently. An act of violence against a police officer will seldom result
in the well being of the individual who employs it, even when done in self
defense. Violence should never be employed as an act of revenge, for acts
of revenge occur after the danger has passed. Violence should never be
employed for the sake of itself, for it communicates the wrong message to
others.
Conclusion
The road to anarchism is not short. We must apply our advantage to
slowly change the conditions upon which government depends. These
conditions are based primarily in the belief that government is necessary.
Thus, our most important task is to challenge this belief. Our best weapon
is our intelligence. Intelligence is free. Ideas can be
multiplied. Let the truths we hold propagate through the minds of
individuals! Be an instigator of thought! By awakening reason our
ranks will swell. Only when we can effectively communicate the ethical
superiority of anarchism can we find fertile ground for the downfall of
government. The solution is not to be found in outbursts of
defiance. The solution rests in the systematic subversion of the
conceptual framework upon which government rests. Rational anarchists,
unleash your truth!
|